Case Reports

Rev Diabet Stud, 2006, 3(4):200-204 DOI 10.1900/RDS.2006.3.200

Prolactinoma in a Diabetic Dialysis Patient with Erectile Dysfunction: A Difficult Differential Diagnosis

Giorgina B. Piccoli1, Francesca Bermont1, Andrea Magnano1, Giorgio Soragna1, Massimo Terzolo2

1Nephrology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Dialisi e Trapianto, Corso Bramante 88, 10126 Torino, Italy.
2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Polo San Luigi, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Address correspondence to: Giorgina B. Piccoli, e-mail: giorgina.piccoli@unito.it

Abstract

Dialysis patients often suffer from erectile dysfunction. The prevalence of this symptom in the context of dialysis is as high as 90%. Diabetes, diffuse vascular disease and pharmacological therapy are attendant causes of this condition, severely impairing the quality of life. Due to the high frequency of erectile dysfunction in uremic patients, minimalist diagnostic approaches are often used. Nevertheless, a careful differential diagnosis is also warranted in well dialyzed patients to identify causes and corrigible patterns. The case reported here exemplifies this critical issue. A 44 year old obese diabetic patient complained about the recent onset of erectile dysfunction. On examination, the penile echo-Doppler was normal, and suggested a cause other than dia-betic vascular disease. The high dialysis efficiency (daily hemodialysis, flexible schedules, EKRc from 15 to 25 ml/min) warranted the same diagnostic work-up as would adopted for non-uremic patients. Whilst the rising prolactine level (76.1 µg/l and 129 ng/ml) was still in the range commonly found in dialysis patients, a nuclear magnetic resonance examination was carried out and led to the identification of prolactinoma. Therapy with cabergoline was found effective and sexual potency was restored. Normalization of hormonal patterns followed within 2 months. This is the first case so far reported in a daily dialysis patient. It underlines the importance of a non-minimalist approach to the problem of sexual disorders in renal replacement therapy (RRT) patients, at least when dialysis efficiency is high and onset is rapid. It also suggests considering prolactinoma as an emerging diagnosis in the general population, which can be detected by the use of sensitive imaging techniques in the differential diagnosis of this condition.

Fulltext: HTML , PDF (610KB)

 

Rev Diabet Stud, 2006, 3(4):205-207 DOI 10.1900/RDS.2006.3.205

Maternally Inherited Diabetes with Deafness and Obesity: Body Weight Reduction Response to Treatment with Insulin Analogues

Maciej T. Malecki1, Jan Skupien1, Tomasz Klupa1, Antonina Naskalska1, Sylwia Gorczynska-Kosiorz2, Dariusz K. Moczulski2, Jacek Sieradzki1

1Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
2Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Silesian School of Medicine, Zabrze, Poland.
Address correspondence to: Maciej T. Malecki, e-mail: mmalecki@cm-uj.krakow.pl

Abstract

Maternally inherited diabetes with deafness (MIDD) is a rare, monogenic form of diabetes mellitus caused by mutations in the mitochondrial genome, the most frequent being the A3243G substitution of the tRNALeu gene. We screened 520 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 45 probands from families with a clinical picture of maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) using restriction fragment length polymorphism. One carrier of the mutation being investigated was found in a proband from a MODY family. The patient was a 20 year-old woman, diagnosed at the age of 16 years as having type 1 diabetes mellitus. On entry to the study, she was treated by a multiple daily injection regimen (MDI) with regular human insulin and human NPH insulin. Typical extra-pancreatic symptoms of MIDD were present, such as macular pattern dystrophy and mild bilateral sensory hearing loss. Additionally, the patient presented abdominal obesity (BMI 32.0), an uncommon feature in monogenic insulin secretion defects, including MIDD. To facilitate weight loss, the diabetes treatment was modified. Since metformin treatment is considered to be contraindicated in MIDD because of the increased risk of lactic acidosis, we used insulin analogues (aspart and detemir) in an MDI regimen and hypocaloric diet. This resulted in a 6.3 kg weight reduction (BMI 27.4) and normalization of HbA1c level (from 7.2 to 6.1 %) during a three-month follow-up. On the basis of this case, we suggest that an MDI regimen with insulin analogues may be a preferred therapeutic option in some rare clinical situations, such as MIDD associated with obesity.

Fulltext: HTML , PDF (332KB)